You are here: News Area News Tax cap opponents shift tactics
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Search

Elmont Online



Tax cap opponents shift tactics

NEW PALTZ -- Opponents of the state's new 2 percent property tax cap are shifting tactics by calling for a "circuit breaker" that would shift the burden for funding schools and local government toward income taxes.

That was one of the pieces of strategy discussed Monday at a gathering of tax protesters, union-backed activists and local lawmakers at the Mohonk Mountain House.

Many members of this group opposed the cap, even as they acknowledged that property taxes in New York are out of sight.

They noted that capping a levy -- the amount of money a taxing entity such as a school district or county can raise each year -- may limit future growth of property taxes, but it provides little in the way of immediate relief.

Because of the property tax burden, "We've got people as we speak who are losing their homes; they can't wait five or 10 years," said John Whiteley of Ticonderoga.

Like others at the meeting, Whitely belongs to the Omnibus Consortium, a wide-ranging group that last year wrestled with the property tax cap.

The group included some who are agnostic on the concept of a cap, along with organizations such as the Fiscal Policy Institute and New Yorkers for Fiscal Fairness who were allied with teachers unions in opposing the cap.

Instead of the cap, they have long supported a circuit breaker that would promise homeowners a reduction in their income taxes if they paid over a certain percent of that income toward property taxes.

Those advocates would now like to see the circuit breaker alongside the cap. The money for that income tax break, however, would have to come from the state.

Proponents say extension of the high-income personal income tax surcharge -- pushed by advocates as the "millionaires' tax" -- that's due to expire at the end of the year could fund a circuit breaker. But so far Gov. Andrew Cuomo has steadfastly opposed an extension, as has the Senate Republican majority.

Whiteley noted that of 2 million state households with incomes under $100,000, fully one-third pay more than 10 percent of their income toward property taxes.

The cap will likely hit poorer communities the hardest, added Betsey Swan of the League of Women Voters, a former school board member.

Since the property tax levies already are lower in poor communities, the 2 percent limit makes it that much harder to catch up.

Cuomo, however, has called for higher school aid, especially for poor districts, for the next two years.

Still, the complaint that counties and school districts will have to make deep cuts to keep their tax levy under 2 percent has become a mantra among local officials, and it was repeated at Monday's gathering.

One of the approximately 120 present asked if counties might ultimately be driven into bankruptcy by the squeeze, although panelists provided no clear indication if that was possible.

Others urged a steady push for a high-income surcharge to fill the gap. While the current surcharge applies to those who earn more than $200,000, some have suggested a tax on those earning more than $1 million is more politically feasible.

Ron Deutsch of New Yorkers for Fiscal Fairness said there are about 65,000 people who earn more than $1 million in the state. But of that number, 29,000 don't even live in New York: They commute from New Jersey or Connecticut but are taxed where they earn their living.

"Unsustainable property taxes have really become a middle-class problem in New York state," Deutsch said.


Read Full Article
 

Comments are now closed for this entry

Important Links

scotusblog

Elmont Chamber_Logo-JPEG

Polls

Can term limits help minimize the negative effects of partisan redistricting?
 

stop domestic violence 1 rectangle decal

If you know SOMETHING, please
DO something! He or She may never save themselves!

The National Domenstic Violence Hotline warns, "Computer use can be monitored and is impossible to completely clear. If you are afraid your internet usage might be monitored, call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1−800−799−7233 or TTY 1−800−787−3224".

Domestic Violence is NOT a private matter, It's a crime against the SOCIETY!


 

open letter-02

Today, we are talking to people about sustainable economic development, because we think it's important to show support for key issues that affect our community - like places in the Elmont for young professionals to live, shop and be entertained; like keeping families closer together and rebuilding the economic and social pillars of the community.

Eyes On ...

 DSC0237 001 c

Barbara Reynolds is a Long Island Regional PTA Board Member and recently installed SEPTA (Special Education Parent Teacher Association) Board Member.  She sent the quoted email to a list of residents and parents shortly after being installed as SEPTA board member.
Read more

 

Related Articles

No Related Articles were found.


Advertisment

Elmont Youth Soccer Club

elmontcardinals

Latest Comments

  • Elmont Residents Voted "No" to Cosmos

    • Aubrey Phillips 05/13/2015 09:16
      Correction: The name of Elmont Board Vice President ...

      Read more...

       
    • Aubrey Phillips 05/04/2015 02:01
      Have you ever had this feeling - "Hey I know you ...

      Read more...

       
    • Eddie dean 04/30/2015 22:16
      Has anyone spoken to Mr mafia for his point on these ...

      Read more...

  • Local School Boards Host Pep Rally For Minor League Soccer Team … Community Underwhelmed!

    • Aubrey Phillips 05/15/2015 07:31
      An alternate view ...

      Read more...

  • Why School Districts should reject Jack Martins’ Fund Balance Argument

    • Tammie Williams 11/12/2014 21:23
      Thank you for this thoughtful educational piece. I ...

      Read more...


Snapshots

Next Week and ...